[ Print Version ]

Look into the opportunities for action below and start advocating for healthy housing today.

Low Income Housing Trust Fund

Homes may have hazards because there is not enough income to maintain the property. The National Housing Trust Fund is a strategy to develop and subsidize decent housing that is affordable to low-income households. Get your neighborhood or faith group signed up to support the Low Income Housing Trust Fund.

Contact Your Senators: Federal Healthy Housing Legislation

Targeted funds and greater authority is needed to get the federal agencies (U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, Environmental Protection Agency, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention) to invest in solutions to health hazards in the home environment. Senator Jack Reed has drafted federal legislation to build knowledge and capacity for healthy homes. Contact your U.S. Senators about supporting his healthy homes bills (the Healthy Housing Council Act of 2009 and the Research, Hazard Intervention, and National Outreach for Healthier Homes Act of 2008). Obtain the contact information for your Senators here and email or call their offices to ask them to cosponsor these bills.

Contact EPA: Renovation, Repair and Painting (RRP) Rule

The new renovation rule requires that painting and repair work in pre-1978 homes and child occupied facilities be performed by trained renovators as of April 2010, but there are not enough training opportunities. Join the Alliance in asking the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to ensure that workers can get trained and certified to perform renovation and remodeling work without leaving behind lead hazards by mailing a letter to the EPA administrator with that message, as written using the following sample language but personalized as you wish.

The Honorable Lisa Jackson

Administrator
Environmental Protection Agency

1200 Constitution Ave. NW
Washington, D.C. 20460

Dear Administrator Jackson:

I believe that EPA should provide compliance assistance in the form of free training for renovators. The advantages of EPA paying for training are: (1) more renovators will be likely to get trained sooner, (2) with better assurance of demand, trainers will come forward to become accredited and actually schedule training deliveries, (3) there will be a slight reduction in the initial cost of compliance that small businesses will incur, (4) there will be one less excuse for non-compliance, and (5) EPA can have a more direct understanding of progress in capacity building. Building lead-safe capacity is a long-standing role of EPA. I We urge you to identify and allocate resources for training. To train 236,000 renovators then costs $44 million. To train workers who are slated to only get on-the-job training and increase the protectiveness of the rule, EPA should allocate another $63 million. A one-time investment of one percent of EPA’s proposed ten billion dollar budget for 2010, or less than 2% of the Agency’s recovery act funding, will speed up compliance with the renovation and slow down the lead poisoning of the nation’s children.

Contact Sen. Lautenberg: TSCA Reform

The Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA, pronounced TAH-ska) is the federal law that is supposed to protect citizens from exposure to asbestos, lead, radon and other poisons. It is a weak law. Even the chemical companies admit it’s not protective. Senator Frank Lautenberg is planning to introduce a new version. He needs encouragement of everyone’s interest. Contact his office to tell him that you support TSCA reform.